Consequently, the DNA analysis ordered by this court upon the request of appellant Webb can no longer be done. The theory of justice as fairness by John Rawls is great in idea, but difficult in application. Government actions and decision about the case After series of deliberation of the case hearing the both sides of the two parties, on January 6,Judge Tolentino rendered her decision, finding Hubert Webb, Peter Estrada, Hospicio Fernandez, Michael Gatchalian, Antonio Lejano II and Miguel Rodriguez guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of rape with homicide.
We all have preconceived notions or opinions of people and things. Is justice already gone with the wind? The veil of ignorance is another questionable idea for me. The second principle of justice as fairness allows inequalities of the social and economic kind in two cases Wenar, They were sentenced to life imprisonment and ordered to indemnify the Vizconde family Php 3 million for the murders.
Seven justices based its decision on the following points: Before stating this conception, however, the following preliminary matters should be kept in mind. The Court of Appeals upholds the guilty verdict.
He says his constitutional right to due process was violated when the state through negligence or willful suppression, failed to produce the semen specimen that could have proven his innocence.
It also deals with negativity. This case must be solved and the Philippine Supreme Court needs to get the decision right, without any question marks. It is also just if certain inequalities are allowed to favor those who are less fortunate.
But how can we obtain Justice if it is really hard to get? It is based on the purely logical idea that we must be consistent in the way we treat similar situations. If appealing the Webb acquittal or retrying Webb for the same crime violates the double jeopardy prohibition, then by all means please change the constitution so that justice can be served.
Having representatives may not work either; it is because the said representatives have their own interests as well. Law enforcement agencies investigate crimes and apprehend suspects.The resultant theory is known as "Justice as Fairness", from which Rawls derives his two principles of justice: the liberty principle and the difference principle.
Contents 1 Objective 2 The “original position” 3 The First Principle of Justice 4 The Second Principle of Justice 5 Relationship to Rawls' later work 6 Criticism 7 See also 8. We will write a custom essay sample on Universality and Reversibility: Justice and Fairness specifically for you for We will write a custom essay sample on Universality and Reversibility: Justice and Fairness specifically for you.
for only $ $/page. Order now. Search. Related Essays. Perception About Fairness Creams ; Ethics. A Theory of Justice Summary Justice as Fairness In A Theory of Justice, Rawls begins with the statement that, ''Justice is the first virtue of social institution,'' meaning that a good society is one structured according to principals of justice.
INTRODUCTION: What is justice? - Justice and Fairness introduction?? This may seem like a simple question to answer but for many in today’s society it is not. Individuals throughout society have their own distinctive explanation of justice.
It is a word in which, to every person, has a different meaning.
Although “Justice” has a vast. John Rawls’ Justice as Fairness There are many critical thinkers who have delved into the concept of justice.
Among them are Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and John Stuart Mill. Another prominent intellectual known for his discourse on justice is John Rawls.
It is he who has created a concept of social justice called “justice. Home Law Essays Justice as Fairness. 0 0 Justice As Fairness John Rails made a significant difference in the way society views Justice. He wanted people to keep in mind that his persuading arguments on the principles of justice come from the original hypothetical positions.
The liberties he claims rational self interested people would.Download